track record
Support for law firms and legal functions as a technical-strategic advisor in disputes where the digital component is critical (data, platforms, automated systems, AI models).
Contribution to reconstructing the technical-organizational context and translating technical elements into decisions and positions understandable to management and counterparties.
Support for law firms and legal functions as a technical-strategic advisor in disputes where the digital component is critical (data, platforms, automated systems, AI models).
Contribution to reconstructing the technical-organizational context and translating technical elements into decisions and positions understandable to management and counterparties.
Support for leadership in managing high-reputational-impact situations where the use of technologies or automations may be challenged.
Establishment of narratives, evidence, and decision traceability (minimum documentation, responsibilities, processes) to reduce ambiguity and strengthen the defensive posture.
Support for leadership in managing high-reputational-impact situations where the use of technologies or automations may be challenged.
Establishment of narratives, evidence, and decision traceability (minimum documentation, responsibilities, processes) to reduce ambiguity and strengthen the defensive posture.
Production of ‘executive-grade’ materials and assets on accountability, explainability, and controls in AI systems, useful for aligning the board, risk owners, and legal teams.
Focus on making corporate decisions consistent, proportionate, and sustainable over time, including in the event of formal or informal challenges.
Production of ‘executive-grade’ materials and assets on accountability, explainability, and controls in AI systems, useful for aligning the board, risk owners, and legal teams.
Focus on making corporate decisions consistent, proportionate, and sustainable over time, including in the event of formal or informal challenges.
We assisted a broad range of national and international clients (individuals, companies, non-governmental organizations, trade associations, trade unions, etc.) in applications before main international courts, including the European Court of Human Rights, or in respect to the collective complaints before the European Committee of Social Rights, and in the proceedings before United Nations human rights monitoring bodies.
We assisted a broad range of national and international clients (individuals, companies, non-governmental organizations, trade associations, trade unions, etc.) in applications before main international courts, including the European Court of Human Rights, or in respect to the collective complaints before the European Committee of Social Rights, and in the proceedings before United Nations human rights monitoring bodies.
We assisted private-sector entities in specific instance procedures before the National Contact Points (NCPs) concerning the application of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
We assisted private-sector entities in specific instance procedures before the National Contact Points (NCPs) concerning the application of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
Regulatory advisory and high-level strategic support provided to a leading financial institution in the context of interactions and formal proceedings with the Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali), concerning an alleged unlawful processing of personal data related to the absence of explicit consent. Design and implementation of an alternative compliance strategy grounded in the legitimate interest legal basis, including a refined legal qualification of the processing activities, a balancing test aligned with GDPR standards, and a risk-based governance approach aimed at ensuring regulatory robustness while preserving operational continuity.
Regulatory advisory and high-level strategic support provided to a leading financial institution in the context of interactions and formal proceedings with the Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali), concerning an alleged unlawful processing of personal data related to the absence of explicit consent. Design and implementation of an alternative compliance strategy grounded in the legitimate interest legal basis, including a refined legal qualification of the processing activities, a balancing test aligned with GDPR standards, and a risk-based governance approach aimed at ensuring regulatory robustness while preserving operational continuity.
We have assisted a Central Bank in proceedings before the General Court of the European Union concerning access to administrative documents and the compatibility of restrictions with EU legislation on transparency and protection of sensitive data. The activity focused on supporting the defence of the position of the Central Bank, paying particular attention to the balance between the right of access to documents and the protection of financial stability and confidentiality of information.
We have assisted a Central Bank in proceedings before the General Court of the European Union concerning access to administrative documents and the compatibility of restrictions with EU legislation on transparency and protection of sensitive data. The activity focused on supporting the defence of the position of the Central Bank, paying particular attention to the balance between the right of access to documents and the protection of financial stability and confidentiality of information.
We have provided expert analysis on cybersecurity risk, state behavior attribution, and technology governance to support legal arguments and compliance assessments in litigation-adjacent contexts.
The activity has included the drafting of technical opinions on the attribution of cyberattacks, controls on the export of sensitive technologies, and due diligence in international scientific collaborations, ensuring compliance with national, European, and international regulations.
We have provided expert analysis on cybersecurity risk, state behavior attribution, and technology governance to support legal arguments and compliance assessments in litigation-adjacent contexts.
The activity has included the drafting of technical opinions on the attribution of cyberattacks, controls on the export of sensitive technologies, and due diligence in international scientific collaborations, ensuring compliance with national, European, and international regulations.
We have provided co-representation in a transnational proceeding before the Lead Authority for the Protection of Personal Data, relating to the use of digital platforms in the healthcare sector. The activity focused on the defense of the legitimacy of the processing of personal data related to user profiling, with particular attention to marketing purposes and the use of sensitive data. Our intervention contributed to the definition of best practices in profiling in the digital health sector.
We have provided co-representation in a transnational proceeding before the Lead Authority for the Protection of Personal Data, relating to the use of digital platforms in the healthcare sector. The activity focused on the defense of the legitimacy of the processing of personal data related to user profiling, with particular attention to marketing purposes and the use of sensitive data. Our intervention contributed to the definition of best practices in profiling in the digital health sector.
We have provided co-legal assistance to a leading broadcaster and telco operator in proceedings before the Data Protection Authority in relation to telemarketing. The activity focused on defense in the context of the investigation, aimed at assessing the compliance of marketing practices with the principles of transparency and consent provided for by the GDPR. Our intervention led to the definition of an adaptation plan in collaboration with the Authority and to the reduction of the expected sanctions.
We have provided co-legal assistance to a leading broadcaster and telco operator in proceedings before the Data Protection Authority in relation to telemarketing. The activity focused on defense in the context of the investigation, aimed at assessing the compliance of marketing practices with the principles of transparency and consent provided for by the GDPR. Our intervention led to the definition of an adaptation plan in collaboration with the Authority and to the reduction of the expected sanctions.
We have provided co-defense to a major newspaper in proceedings before AGCOM for alleged copyright infringement and application of the Authority’s regulation on digital content. The activity focused on contesting the existence of the violation and on protecting the newspaper’s freedom of expression, taking into account the balance between copyright and the right to information. Our intervention contributed to strengthening the regulatory framework on freedom of the press in the digital sphere.
We have provided co-defense to a major newspaper in proceedings before AGCOM for alleged copyright infringement and application of the Authority’s regulation on digital content. The activity focused on contesting the existence of the violation and on protecting the newspaper’s freedom of expression, taking into account the balance between copyright and the right to information. Our intervention contributed to strengthening the regulatory framework on freedom of the press in the digital sphere.
We provided co-legal assistance in proceedings before the Data Protection Authority concerning the transfer of a database containing genetic information for research and commercial purposes.
The activity focused on the defense of the legitimacy of the processing pursuant to art. 9 GDPR, with arguments based on explicit consent, public interest in the health sector and scientific necessity.
We provided co-legal assistance in proceedings before the Data Protection Authority concerning the transfer of a database containing genetic information for research and commercial purposes.
The activity focused on the defense of the legitimacy of the processing pursuant to art. 9 GDPR, with arguments based on explicit consent, public interest in the health sector and scientific necessity.
We have developed extensive experience and specialized expertise in litigation related to the energy and infrastructure sectors. In particular, we handle disputes concerning the siting of facilities; challenges to decisions issued by ARERA (the Regulatory Authority for Energy, Networks and Environment), especially regarding tariff measures and sanctioning provisions; support in authorization procedures; and assistance in the development of projects.
We have developed extensive experience and specialized expertise in litigation related to the energy and infrastructure sectors. In particular, we handle disputes concerning the siting of facilities; challenges to decisions issued by ARERA (the Regulatory Authority for Energy, Networks and Environment), especially regarding tariff measures and sanctioning provisions; support in authorization procedures; and assistance in the development of projects.
